Balance - The Key to Energy

A look at environmental policies in President Ma Ying-jeou’s election platform reveals that he proposed to promote energy diversification and raise the consumption of low carbon-emitting energy.

This seems to envision a future in which Taiwan will have a choice of energy resources and in which carbon dioxide emissions will be greatly reduced, turning Taiwan into a low-emissions society. However, there has been no discussion of the costs of achieving this goal.

It is difficult to imagine that Ma intends to increase low-emissions power generation to more than 50 percent of total electricity generation by building additional nuclear power plants. The only choice left is to develop sources of renewable energy.

The previous government set the goal of raising the proportion of renewable energy in the consumption of electricity to 10 percent of capacity by 2010, but actual production might only end up half of that. Official statistics show that we have spent around NT$14 billion (US$460.4 million) thus far on installing wind power generation systems for an annual electricity production of nearly 800 million kilowatt-hours, and reducing emissions by 0.23 percent.

Energy problems involve quantitative and qualitative aspects, and both should be taken into consideration. The former aspect relates to whether supply is sufficient, while the latter covers questions like safety, stability and environmental protection.

Current renewable energy sources such as wind power, solar energy and biofuels perform very well on environmental protection indexes in terms of pollution and carbon dioxide emissions.

The inherent limitations of these energies, however, are their lack of stability and safety.

More importantly, small production volume and regional limitations mean that they cannot be supplied on a large scale.

Another crucial factor for these energies is their high cost, so it may turn out that we will simply be unable to solve Taiwan’s energy problems through renewable energies alone.

The only way to respond to rising energy prices is to conserve energy and improve the efficiency of energy use. Energy-saving architecture might be the best tool we have in this regard.

The government should convene a national conference on energy issues and commence a comprehensive, long-term analysis of potential energy resources.

However, it should not arbitrarily endorse the development of a certain energy source and make large investments that allow a specific industry to profit.

Instead, it should conduct an objective supply-and-demand analysis and explore what different renewable energy sources can contribute in terms of quality and quantity when fully developed.

All this should be carefully assessed, and the government should provide the public with objective and quantifiable data for reference. In so doing, the government should not always trust in academic authority and waste valuable resources for research and development.

View the Taipei Times story by clicking here.

TheBioenergySite News Desk

Sign up for our
regular news updates

Latest Bioenergy Industry News

•   Reverse Underspend for R&D, Says Science Campaign
•   US Grain Production Forecasts Up Across the Board
•   Algae Farm: a Step Closer to Marketing Algae Booster
•   Weekly Outlook: Where is the Bottom?
•   Fillmore Wind Farm Proposed
•   $4 Million for Offshore Wind Project Proposal
•   New Wind Farm for Fowler
•   Plans for Ethanol Plant in Jackson
•   Biomass Power Plant for Avonmouth
•   Belgian Biogas Sets Example for Britain